Article Text
PDF
Abstract
Aims Research reporting checklists are itemised writing standards to improve transparency and facilitate reproducibility. Previous assessments of their recommendation or requirement have demonstrated improved checklist adherence across medical specialties and study designs. Here, we investigated the endorsement of reporting checklists within pathology, laboratory medicine and forensic science journals.
Methods We queried Google Scholar Metrics and the Scopus CiteScore tool to identify top pathology and forensic medicine journals. Two authors independently assessed for the mention, recommendation or requirement or checklists—derived from the Enhancing the Quality and Transparency Of Health Research (EQUATOR) network—as well as study preregistration within each journal’s aims and instructions for authors. Journal editors were contacted by one author every 3 weeks to confirm whether or not certain study designs would be considered for publication.
Results Of the 88 journals evaluated, most did not mention or endorse the EQUATOR Network (73.9%) or International Committee of Medical Journal Editors reporting standards (51.1%). The most commonly reported checklists included Animal Research: Reporting of In Vivo Experiments (38.6%), Consolidated Standards of Reporting Trials (28.4%) and Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (25.0%). The CARE reporting checklist for case reports was required most often by five journals (5.7%). The final email response from journal editors and contacts was 9.1%.
Conclusions Reporting checklists were suboptimally mentioned and rarely required. Even with many basic and diagnostic science reporting checklists and initiatives, endorsement remains low. We recommend that authors, reviewers and editors become familiar with relevant reporting checklists for their fields and publishing spaces to improve checklist visibility and adherence for scientific transparency, reproducibility and rigour.
- Methods
- Medical Laboratory Science
- QUALITY CONTROL
Data availability statement
Data are available in a public, open access repository. Raw data are freely available on OSF (https://osf.io/j5e3a/).
Statistics from Altmetric.com
Data availability statement
Data are available in a public, open access repository. Raw data are freely available on OSF (https://osf.io/j5e3a/).
Footnotes
Handling editor Vikram Deshpande.
X @gkh_research
Contributors The study was conceived, designed and supervised by GH, who also conducted the statistical analysis, interpreted the data and drafted the manuscript. Data collection, initial data interpretation and drafting were performed by GH, CO'B and RA. MV contributed to drafting the manuscript and critically revising it for intellectual content. All authors have reviewed and approved the final version of the manuscript and agree to be accountable for all aspects of the work. GH is the guarantor of this work. The contributorship statement was generated using ChatGPT using a prompt which listed author initials and contributions.
Funding The authors have not declared a specific grant for this research from any funding agency in the public, commercial or not-for-profit sectors.
Competing interests MV reports receipt of funding from the National Institute on Drug Abuse, the National Institute on Alcohol Abuse and Alcoholism, the US Office of Research Integrity, Oklahoma Center for Advancement of Science and Technology, and internal grants from Oklahoma State University Center for Health Sciences—all outside of the present work. All other authors have no conflicts to report.
Provenance and peer review Not commissioned; externally peer reviewed.
Supplemental material This content has been supplied by the author(s). It has not been vetted by BMJ Publishing Group Limited (BMJ) and may not have been peer-reviewed. Any opinions or recommendations discussed are solely those of the author(s) and are not endorsed by BMJ. BMJ disclaims all liability and responsibility arising from any reliance placed on the content. Where the content includes any translated material, BMJ does not warrant the accuracy and reliability of the translations (including but not limited to local regulations, clinical guidelines, terminology, drug names and drug dosages), and is not responsible for any error and/or omissions arising from translation and adaptation or otherwise.